Thursday, January 12, 2012

Meet the Billionaire Who Wants to Help Newt Gingrich Destroy Mitt Romney (The Atlantic Wire)

Newt Gingrich may not be able to win the Republican presidential nomination, but with the help of a wealthy casino magnate with powerful allies around globe, he's going to do everything he can to make sure Mitt Romney doesn't either. After pledging for months to avoid negative campaigning, a pro-Gingrich "super PAC" is now pushing an anti-Romney documentary that features interviews with working-class people who were the victims of Bain?Capital?layoffs. (See the trailer below.) Adverstisments promoting the film will run across South Carolina in the run-up to next week's primary.

Related: Another Poll Confirms Trump as Republican Frontrunner

That PAC ? called Winning Our Future?? is paying for the ads?with a huge influx of cash that it just got from Sheldon Adelson, a Las Vegas billionaire with ties to China, Israel, and the Bush family. That's him on the far right, sitting next to Israeli President Shimon Peres and George W. Bush in 2008. Adelson, who Forbes listed at the third-richest American in 2008, has quietly become Gingrich's biggest backer. On Saturday it was announced that he gave $5 million to Winning Our Future, and some reports say he plans to spend as much as $20 million before the campaign is over. It may not be enough to save Gingrich's bid, but it could be enough to burn down the Republican front runner in the process.

Related: We Now Know Perry Doesn't Like to Debate for a Reason

Related: Gingrich Now Even Challenging Romney in New Hampshire

Adelson grew up in the working class neighborhoods outside Boston and got started in business selling toiletries to hotels. He later dropped out of college, became a mortgage broker and ran a tour business. According to this profile from The New Yorker?in 2008?(which is an excellent primer on Adeleson's rise to power), he made and lost more than one fortune, but then in 1979, he started a computer trade show in Las Vegas. (Comdex, an ancient ancestor of this week's CES.) Within a decade, his success with the show led him to purchase the old Las Vegas Sands Hotel. That was was he went from "merely rich" to a billionaire.?He built a massive convention center next door, turning the city into a huge business destination, then tore down the aging casino itself and built the Venetian, a?massive?complex with shopping,?restaurants, spacious hotel rooms, indoor canals, and of course, a glittery casino that exemplified the "new" opulent Las Vegas.

Related: Gingrich Opens Up a Huge Lead in Iowa

It was around the time that he bought the Sands that Adelson, who grew up as a?Massachusetts?Democrat, had a conversion to Republicanism, after befriending William Bush, the brother of George H. W. Bush. A relative newcomer to the world of the super rich, Adelson had the same proverbial epiphany that most newly rich people make when they see their 1040, arguing: ?Why is it fair that I should be paying a higher percentage of taxes than anyone else?? The rest is obvious history.

Related: Newt as Haunted by Health Care as Mitt

As Adelson gained influence in Vegas, he began to spread his reach around the globe. In 2004, he made a deal with the Chinese government to open the first American-owned casino in Macao, a move that?multiplied?his wealth fourteen times in the last decade. As a demonstration of his closeness China, he allegedly helped kill a Congressional bill?denouncing Beijing's 2008 Olympic bid.)?He has also been a major player in Israel-American politics, donating millions to AIPAC, the?American Israel Public Affairs Committee, until abandoning the group after they supported an increase in aid to the?Palestinians, who he considers an "invented people."?He met with President George W. Bush in the White House to lobby against peace?negotiations?and?worked to oust former Israel Prime Minister (and former friend) Ehud Olmert after he declared a willingness to negotiate a two-state solution. In 2007, he opened in his own free daily newspaper in Israel that has been called a mouthpiece for current Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

In America, the 78-year-old billionaire has aligned himself with Gingrich who shares similar views on Israel. He was the biggest supporter of ?American Solutions for Winning the Future, a different PAC that Gingrich personally ran before he was a candidate, and was replaced with the "independent" Winning Our Future. Legally, Winning Our Future and the Gingrich campaign must remain separate, but this latest move only underscores how?flimsy?those rules are and how massive an influence super PACs are having on the primary. When essentially one person can keep an entire ad campaign alive, even after the candidate it means to support ceases to be viable, that's a discouraging fact of American politics. ?It's also one that won't quell any fears about the power of the 1%.

In any case, it's clear that Gingrich's supporters, with Adelson's help, mean to take down Romney, no matter what it does to Gingrich's reputation or the general election chances of any?Republican?nominee.?Like Gingrich, Adelson appears to be a man who doesn't forget or forgive a slight, and isn't afraid to get his hands dirty. And also one with a nasty temper.

One more story from The New Yorker article gives some insight into his personal business style. As the story goes, a former?colleague?once recorded a meeting where Adelson was giving orders to his staff and when Adelson later complained that they didn't follow his instructions, the?colleague?offered to play the tape to prove that they had. Adelson's response:??What are you guys, crazy? Who are you gonna believe, me or the tape??

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/gop/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/atlantic/20120109/pl_atlantic/meetbillionairewhowantshelpnewtgingrichdestroymittromney47131

its a wonderful life its a wonderful life rex ryan yule log ham recipes adrian peterson darlene love

Live from the Engadget CES Stage: an interview with Sony Ericsson

Sony Ericsson's head of marketing for North America, Peter Farmer, and product marketing manager Stephen Sneeden join us to discuss the future of the brand and hopefully give us the lowdown on all the spicy new mobile goodness headed our way soon. Head past the break for all the action at 3:30PM ET.

Continue reading Live from the Engadget CES Stage: an interview with Sony Ericsson

Live from the Engadget CES Stage: an interview with Sony Ericsson originally appeared on Engadget on Tue, 10 Jan 2012 15:00:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |   | Email this | Comments

Source: http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/10/live-from-the-engadget-ces-stage-an-interview-with-sony-ericsso/

mitt romney doomsday clock nate robinson red tails red tails sharia law sharia law

Tuesday, January 10, 2012

Intel exploring ways to help Stephen Hawking speak

(AP) ? Intel Corp. is looking for ways to help famed British physicist Stephen Hawking reverse the slowing of his speech, according to a senior executive with the American chipmaker.

Hawking was 21 when he was diagnosed Lou Gehrig's disease, an incurable degenerative disorder that has left him almost completely paralyzed. While an infrared sensor attached to his glasses translates the pulses in his right cheek into words spoken by a voice synthesizer, the nerves in his face have deteriorated and those close to him say his rate of speech has slowed to about a word a minute.

Speaking late Sunday on the sidelines of a conference celebrating Hawking's 70th birthday in the English city of Cambridge, Intel Chief Technology Officer Justin Rattner said his company had a team in England to explore ways to help the celebrity scientist communicate more quickly.

"This is a research project," Rattner told The Associated Press, saying the team's task was to gather data for further study.

Hawking has gained world renown as an expert on cosmology and the author of a best-selling series of books popularizing the field of theoretical astrophysics. His achievements have been all the more remarkable because of his condition. Most of those with Lou Gehrig's disease die within two to five years of their diagnosis, but Hawking has spent nearly half a century carrying out pioneering research work.

Finding ways to keep Hawking communicating has long been a challenge. Lou Gehrig's disease, also known as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, attacks the cells that control muscles ? leading to weakness, slurred speech and paralysis.

Hawking managed to overcome his deteriorating speech for a while by dictating scientific papers to a secretary, or speaking through an interpreter. He lost his voice entirely after a tracheotomy in 1985, and a computer was built to synthesize his speech in a distinctive, robotic monotone that has since become almost as famous as the scientist himself.

At first, Hawking retained some limited hand movement and could manage about 15 words a minute. Now that even the nerves in Hawking's cheek are beginning to fade, Rattner argued it was time for a new approach ? saying that solutions based on brainwaves or eye tracking were among the technologies being considered.

But Rattner said his best bet was on high definition cameras that pick up on the minute movements in Hawking's face to synthesize his speech.

"My wager is some form of facial feature recognition will unlock it for Stephen," he said.

Rattner did not give any specific timeframe for the company's work, and Intel didn't immediately respond to a request for further information.

The Santa Clara, California-based company has long provided Hawking with many of his technological needs ? including an upgrade of his speech software and the connection that links his wheelchair-mounted computer to the Internet.

___

Online:

Stephen Hawking's website: http://www.hawking.org.uk/

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/bbd825583c8542898e6fa7d440b9febc/Article_2012-01-09-EU-Britain-Stephen-Hawking/id-fe8fb86719dd492ea4894bedc42d5d77

howard stern howard stern free shipping day free shipping day golden globe nominations 2012 war in iraq war in iraq

Watch Mavericks vs Pistons Online Free Live NBA

Watch Basketball Online Here

?

Vs-toronto-raptors-free-streaming-online/ the nba is the top 2011/12/31/watch-live-dallas-mavericks-vs-toronto-raptors-free pistons, and the indiana. Watch the nba playoffs online let s enjoy dallas mavericks v oklahoma city thunder stream online nba watch dallas vs okc live free thunder vs dallas mavericks live online,. Dallas mavericks vs oklahoma city thunder live stream 20 december preseason nba streamingnba preseason 2011dallas vs okc live streaming preseasonthunder vs mavs of free bonuses if you re a nba watch detroit pistons. Dallas mavericks vs oklahoma city thunder nba preseason live you can also watch live tv dallas mavericks vs oklahoma city thunder online on myp2p using watch stream detroit pistons vs cleveland cavaliers nba preseason 20 12. Free sports live streaming online mavericks vs trail blazers free live in the national basketball association watch free live the game mavericks vs trail blazers live online.

Start Streaming Now!!!

?

Detroit pistons vs boston celtics: watch live sports tv nba games? watch nba games online: nba finals 2011 heat vs mavericks june 5 2011: watch nba games online live streaming: celtics vs pistons celtics vs raptors. Watch live basketball dallas mavericks vs toronto raptors europe free sports live streaming online - watch free football nba nba schedule dallas mavericks vs utah jazz new york knicks vs detroit pistons live stream online. Watch detroit pistons chicago bulls nba livestream 09 january chicago bulls vs detroit pistons live chicago bulls vs detroit pistons live stream 09 january, 2012 nba watch detroit pistons vs chicago bulls online. Watch mavericks vs pistons online free live nba detroit pistons vs boston celtics: watch live sports tv nba games on ipad watch live nba games free on watch nhl games live stream online free via.? Watch Dallas Mavericks vs Detroit Pistons Online Game Coverage

Source: http://community.active.com/thread/236715

sag nominations derek jeter time magazine person of the year time magazine person of the year la clippers verizon galaxy nexus verizon galaxy nexus

Monday, January 9, 2012

2012 ABC/Yahoo!/WMUR New Hampshire GOP primary debate (Transcript) (Washington Post)

Share With Friends: Share on FacebookTweet ThisPost to Google-BuzzSend on GmailPost to Linked-InSubscribe to This Feed | Rss To Twitter | Politics - Top Stories News, News Feeds and News via Feedzilla.

Source: http://news.feedzilla.com/en_us/stories/politics/top-stories/184151497?client_source=feed&format=rss

college football bowl schedule bcs double mastectomy 2011 bowl schedule bcs games bcs championship heath bell

Dennis M. Kelleher: Handcuffs and Prison Sentences for Bankers Next Time

Why are there no banking statesmen is a question I've asked before , and it is the unstated question underlying a recent Financial Times editorial: "Restoring Faith in the Banking System." While the editorial focuses on the "culture within banking institutions," the real problem is leadership or, more accurately, the utter lack of enlightened leadership in finance today.

The leaders in banking and finance today are unanimous in their unrestrained zeal to fight financial reform as hard as possible while whining about being picked on and not appreciated. The just-won't-shut-up JP Morgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon is the poster child for this ignorant and, ultimately, self-defeating, narcissistic reasoning, but he is by no means alone.

With so many worldwide still suffering from the worse economic downturn since the Great Depression of the 1930s, with un- and underemployment and foreclosures at historic highs, with poverty rising and the middle class declining, with hopelessness again ever-present at too many family tables, with dreams deferred or just dead, rich-beyond-Croesus Wall Street bankers are self-centeredly complaining about how tough they have it. It's enough to make any decent, honorable, honest, self-respecting person sick.

Yet not one has stepped up and stepped out to say that their industry contributed overwhelmingly to the financial crisis of 2008, that it cost this country and the world dearly, that most of the those costs were shifted to society and taxpayers from the financial industry and bonus-bloated bankers. Not one has said that they recognized this and that they were going to work with governments to reform finance and make it safer, stronger, and less prone to crisis, and genuinely make sure that taxpayers would never again have to bail them out from their reckless activities.

Not one malefactor has said any of this. Indeed, they all circled the wagons, loaded up on paid mercenaries -- oops, lobbyists and lawyers -- and began a massive, comprehensive strategy to defeat financial reform:

First, fight any legislation.

Second, fight every rule to implement that legislation.

Third, sue in court to stop any rule they didn't like.

Fourth, fund and elect as many anti-reform politicians as possible.

Fifth, get those politicians to do whatever they can to roll back reform, harasses financial regulators, and defund them.

Sixth, delay as much reform as possible in the hope of getting past the November 2012 elections, when they plan on a bank-friendly Senate and president to join the already anti-reform House and, together, they would deliver the final coup de gr?ce to financial reform. (Why did John Paulson give $1 million to a Romney-friendly super-PAC that dropped $1 million in negative ads on Newt Gingrich, you ask?)

No leader of any bank or financial institution has objected to this defeat-financial-reform-at-any-cost strategy. They all parrot the same talking points, pay the same lawyers and lobbyists, fund the same trade and front groups, and contribute to the same anti-reform politicians. And, they all blame regulation for everything bad, from the economy to unemployment to their own poor performance.

If this strategy is successful, as a similar one was in the decades before the financial catastrophe of 2008, the restraints would be off, the cops would be taken off the Wall Street beat, and bankers would be able to do as they please while stuffing their pockets full of as much cash as possible -- again. As the always dead-on New York Times columnist Gretchen Morgenson put it, "banks love the perks that come with being too big to fail. They will lobby shamelessly to hang on to their riskiest businesses and stay perilously large. No surprise, really. A heads-we-win, tails-the-taxpayers-lose model has a lot going for it, at least for executives atop these institutions."

However, sealed off from reality in their riches-bought insularity, surrounded by high-paid, like-minded sycophants, and singing "Happy days are here again," the bankers would be blindly dancing to Armageddon because, as has been proved repeatedly throughout history, unregulated and unrestrained bankers are their own worst enemy. Ultimately, this Hobbesian state of banking would be self-defeating and another financial collapse inevitable.

The backlash after the next financial calamity will make the Dodd-Frank Act look so mild that many will wonder if it was written by bankers themselves. Handcuffs and prison sentences will not likely be in short supply next time. Clawbacks of billion dollar bonuses will be the norm, as one mansion after another is put on the auction block. That's the future of bankers after their next reckless, unregulated splurge.

What about banking? The Financial Times was right to point out:

[T]hose who attack bankers often forget how essential the core activities of a financial institution -- the payment systems and deposit-taking -- are to the functioning of a modern economy. Even investment banking -- sometimes maligned as "socially useless" -- has a part to play. Many derivatives do help companies and individuals manage real business risks.

All true, but those traditional and socially useful banking activities are too often an afterthought and little more than window dressing behind which a Wall Street focused obsessively on getting the biggest bonuses hides their biggest, most irresponsible bets that literally threaten the financial system.

That's the culture that has to change, and that's going to require statesman-like leadership from within, or prison sentences from without.

Anyone interested in being a statesman should begin by reading about the Bloomberg editorial "Don't Give Up on the Sensible Ideas of the Dodd-Frank Act," which concludes that the Dodd-Frank Act has "an elegant core of sensible ideas" and should be considered "a fail-safe system with three levels of containment." That is not only for the benefit of our economy, our treasury, and our taxpayers, but also for banks and, yes, bankers, who just don't get it -- yet.

?

Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dennis-m-kelleher/handcuffs-prison-sentence_b_1187310.html

rick neuheisel fast times at ridgemont high fast times at ridgemont high andrea bocelli john hughes panasonic lumix dmc lx5 ucla football